Search For Bombs, Not Nail Clippers, salon.com
Airport security depends to a large degree on the human
security agents who search the passenger's luggage for weapons and
bombs. From complex systems we know that the instructions that the
agents receive are crucial for the success of the operation and
the level of security that can be achieved. On a recent
international flight with domestic connecting flights we could
observe that these procedures seem to be less than optimal and not
consistent with each other. For instance in Detroit airport on
01//11/07 passengers could not even get a plastic knife in the
airport restaurants for their meals. Once they boarded the plane,
they got their meals served, including plastic knives. On 01/11/01
at the same airport, security agents confiscated my key-ring
carabiner because it could potentially be used to strike someone.
When I asked the security agents, if they could identify plastic
explosives, if there were any in my carry-on luggage, they had to
decline, they didn't know what it would look like.
Maybe I was lucky that my uttering the words "plastic
explosives" did not trigger the evacuation of the terminal
building, something that apparently happened when a pilot used the
word "gun" at a Baltimore airport when he protested the
confiscation of is nail clipper. Extreme literal interpretation of
rules can in the end lead to less and not more security when
people stop taking them serious.
Search
For Bombs, Not Nail
Clippers, P.
Smith, salon.com, 01/10/30