Mapping the Minds in Iraq's Regime,, LA Times
Excerpts: A team using
influence-net models tested destructive, electronic warfare and psychological
actions to see if any was especially decisive in bringing about the
commander's goals. One question posed was how to force one side to back down
without resorting to the use of weapons of mass destruction.
JWAC [Joint Warfare Analysis Center, Ed.] (...) is virtually unheard of
outside secret military-planning circles. Defense Secretary Donald H.
Rumsfeld, in recognition of the unit's importance, has called for the Pentagon
to broaden its multidisciplinary capability "to depict adversaries as complex,
adaptive systems."
Homeland-Security Research: Mission Impossible?,, Nature
Excerpts: Scientific research has long been
central to US national security policy. Throughout the cold war, US
researchers strove to develop better weapons and intelligence-gathering
technologies than their Soviet counterparts. But when confronting terrorism,
where the threats are diverse and hard to assess, it is not so easy to set
research priorities. "It's going to be more complex than building a rocket or
a nuclear weapon," says Page Stoutland, deputy division leader for
counter-terrorism (...).
The main concern is the possibility of terrorists gaining weapons of mass
destruction.
Air Security Focusing on Flier Screening,, Washington
Post
Excerpts: (...) to
demonstrate how artificial intelligence and other powerful software can
analyze passengers' travel reservations, housing information, family ties,
identifying details in credit reports and other personal data to determine if
they're "rooted in the community" -- or have an unusual history that indicates
a potential threat.
Now transportation and intelligence officials believe that CAPPS II --
short for the second-generation Computer Assisted Passenger rescreening System
-- will form the core of a new framework in aviation security: a far more
intense focus on people rather than baggage.
Homeland Security: The White House Plan Explained And
Examined,, Brookings Forum
Event Information: Richard A. Falkenrath, special
assistant to President Bush for homeland security and senior director for
policy and plans, will present a broad overview of the administration's
strategy for homeland security in the wake of the September 11 terrorist
attacks.
Falkenrath also will address legislative issues Congress still must resolve
related to the proposed establishment of a new Cabinet-level Department of
Homeland Security, such as whether to give the department's executives
flexibility on personnel matters and whether to include intelligence analysis
in its responsibilities.
September 11, One Year Later: What's Ahead for an Altered
Homeland,, Brookings Forum
Excerpts: The September 11 terrorist attacks
had a major impact on virtually every aspect of American life-foreign,
defense, and intelligence policies; economic, budgetary, political, and
societal consequences; security of the American homeland; and the way
Americans conduct their day-to-day lives.
The Brookings Institution has spent much of the past year examining these
and other implications of that terrible day. At this forum, Deputy Defense
Secretary Paul Wolfowitz will deliver the keynote speech, leading Brookings
scholars will explain their initial findings and discuss future challenges,
(...).
Investigating 9/11: An Unimaginable Calamity, Still Largely
Unexamined, NYTimes
Excerpt: Another residue of the 1993
attack was the use of helicopters by the police, who landed on a roof and
removed stranded people. The firefighters, whose department has no helicopter,
saw the police as showboats taking risks.
Afterward, the Port Authority, with the agreement of the Fire Department,
decided to lock the roof doors as a security measure. On Sept. 11, some 200
people tried to get onto the roof of the south tower but could not open the
door.
New Deterrence Approach Needed to Discourage
Terrorism,, National Academy Press
Excerpts: In addition to traditional
deterrence strategies, fighting terrorism may require working more closely
with countries and third parties who are able to communicate more effectively
with terrorists, says a new report from the National Academies' Center for
Social and Economic Studies. The report, which examines what terrorists hold
in value, recommends a long term, contextualized approach to countering
terrorism.