@article {Hernandez2019,
	title = {Anger while driving in Mexico City},
	journal = {PLOS ONE},
	volume = {14},
	number = {9},
	year = {2019},
	month = {09},
	pages = {1-20},
	publisher = {Public Library of Science},
	abstract = {This study aims to analyze the level of anger developed by drivers in Mexico City and also understand the behavior that those drivers use to express that anger, using four different survey methods. The first focuses on personal information, the second Driving Anger Expression Inventory (DAX), the third refers to a shorten version of Driving Anger Scale (DAS) and the fourth being the Dula Dangerous Driving Index (DDDI). These have previously been applied and validated in several different countries. The questionnaires were filled out online by 626 drivers. Using the data collected through the online platform, it was possible to identify the kind of reactions volunteers displayed while driving. Also, it was possible to identify that people in Mexico City developed anger depending on their driving area. Our analyses shows that in the Adaptive/Constructive Expression subscale, males and females show a significant difference in their mean score, with women express their anger in a more constructive way than males.},
	doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0223048},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223048},
	author = {Hern{\'a}ndez-Hern{\'a}ndez, Ana Mar{\'\i}a and Siqueiros-Garc{\'\i}a, Jes{\'u}s M. and Robles-Belmont, Eduardo and Gershenson, Carlos}
}
@unpublished {CxExplicada2019,
	title = {Complejidad Explicada},
	year = {2019},
	note = {Traducci{\'o}n de {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}Complexity Explained{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright}},
	url = {https://complexityexplained.github.io},
	author = {Valerie C. Valerio Holgu{\'\i}n and Carlos Gershenson and Jos{\'e} Luis Herrera and Johann H. Mart{\'\i}nez and Manuel Rueda Santos and Oliver L{\'o}pez Corona and Guillermo de Anda J{\'a}uregui and Gerardo I{\~n}iguez and Alfredo J. Morales Guzm{\'a}n and Jos{\'e} R. Nicol{\'a}s Carlock}
}
@article {10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007517,
	title = {Efficient sentinel surveillance strategies for preventing epidemics on networks},
	journal = {PLOS Computational Biology},
	volume = {15},
	number = {11},
	year = {2019},
	month = {11},
	pages = {1-19},
	publisher = {Public Library of Science},
	abstract = {Author summary In a network of individuals susceptible to some infectious disease, what are the best locations to monitor in order to detect the infection before most damage can be done? In this paper we address this question by considering various heuristic strategies for sentinel placement that can potentially be implemented in real-world situations without requiring excessive amounts of computation, or even having perfect data about the structure of the network. We find that strategies that attempt to distribute sentinels over different regions of the network perform best in highly modular or spatially embedded networks, whereas the strategy of targeting the most well connected individuals works best when there is a considerable amount of contact heterogeneity between individuals. Our results may be used as a guideline to help decide when certain strategies should, or should not, be implemented.},
	doi = {10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007517},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007517},
	author = {Colman, Ewan and Holme, Petter and Sayama, Hiroki and Gershenson, Carlos}
}
@article {161,
	title = {When slower is faster},
	journal = {Complexity},
	volume = {21},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {9{\textendash}15},
	abstract = {The slower is faster (SIF) effect occurs when a system performs worse as its components try to do better. Thus, a moderate individual efficiency actually leads to a better systemic performance. The SIF effect takes place in a variety of phenomena. We review studies and examples of the SIF effect in pedestrian dynamics, vehicle traffic, traffic light control, logistics, public transport, social dynamics, ecological systems, and adaptation. Drawing on these examples, we generalize common features of the SIF effect and suggest possible future lines of research. {\copyright} 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Complexity 21: 9{\textendash}15, 2015},
	keywords = {cascading effects, collective motion, Evolution, phase transitions},
	issn = {1099-0526},
	doi = {10.1002/cplx.21736},
	url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.06796},
	author = {Gershenson, Carlos and Helbing, Dirk}
}
@inbook {GershensonHeylighen2004,
	title = {Protocol Requirements for Self-Organizing Artifacts: Towards an Ambient Intelligence},
	booktitle = {Unifying Themes in Complex Systems},
	volume = {V},
	year = {2011},
	note = {Also VUB AI-Lab Memo 04-04},
	pages = {136-143},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	address = {Berlin Heidelberg},
	abstract = {We discuss which properties common-use artifacts should have to collaborate without human intervention. We conceive how devices, such as mobile phones, PDAs, and home appliances, could be seamlessly integrated to provide an "ambient intelligence" that responds to the users desires without requiring explicit programming or commands. While the hardware and software technology to build such systems already exists, yet there is no protocol to direct and give meaning to their interactions. We propose the first steps in the development of such a protocol, which would need to be adaptive, extensible, and open to the community, while promoting self-organization. We argue that devices, interacting through "game-like" moves, can learn to agree about how to communicate, with whom to cooperate, and how to delegate and coordinate specialized tasks. Like this, they may evolve distributed cognition or collective intelligence able to tackle any complex of tasks.},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-17635-7_17},
	url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin.AO/0404004},
	author = {Carlos Gershenson and Francis Heylighen},
	editor = {Minai, Ali and Braha, Dan and Yaneer {Bar-Yam}}
}
@inbook {BalpoGershenson:2010,
	title = {Modular Random {Boolean} Networks},
	booktitle = {{Artificial Life XII} Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {303-304},
	publisher = {MIT Press},
	organization = {MIT Press},
	address = {Odense, Denmark},
	url = {http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/chapters/0262290758chap56.pdf},
	author = {Rodrigo {Poblanno-Balp} and Carlos Gershenson},
	editor = {Harold Fellermann and Mark D{\"o}rr and Martin M. Hanczyc and Lone Ladegaard Laursen and Sarah Maurer and Daniel Merkle and Pierre-Alain Monnard and Kasper St${\o}$y and Steen Rasmussen}
}
@inbook {HeylighenEtAl2007,
	title = {Complexity and Philosophy},
	booktitle = {Complexity, Science and Society},
	year = {2007},
	pages = {117-134},
	publisher = {Radcliffe Publishing},
	organization = {Radcliffe Publishing},
	address = {Oxford},
	url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.CC/0604072},
	author = {Francis Heylighen and Paul Cilliers and Carlos Gershenson},
	editor = {Jan Bogg and Robert Geyer}
}
@inbook {GershensonHeylighen2005,
	title = {How Can We Think the Complex?},
	booktitle = {Managing Organizational Complexity: Philosophy, Theory and Application},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {47{\textendash}61},
	publisher = {Information Age Publishing},
	organization = {Information Age Publishing},
	chapter = {3},
	abstract = {This chapter does not deal with specific tools and techniques for managing complex systems, but proposes some basic concepts that help us to think and speak about complexity. We review classical thinking and its intrinsic drawbacks when dealing with complexity. We then show how complexity forces us to build models with indeterminacy and unpredictability. However, we can still deal with the problems created in this way by being adaptive, and profiting from a complex system{\textquoteright}s capability for selforganization, and the distributed intelligence this may produce.},
	url = {http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/nlin.AO/0402023},
	author = {Carlos Gershenson and Francis Heylighen},
	editor = {Kurt Richardson}
}
@conference {Gershenson2004c,
	title = {Introduction to Random {Boolean} Networks},
	booktitle = {Workshop and Tutorial Proceedings, Ninth International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems {(ALife} {IX)}},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {160{\textendash}173},
	address = {Boston, MA},
	abstract = {The goal of this tutorial is to promote interest in the study of random Boolean networks (RBNs). These can be very interesting models, since one does not have to assume any functionality or particular connectivity of the networks to study their generic properties. Like this, RBNs have been used for exploring the configurations where life could emerge. The fact that RBNs are a generalization of cellular automata makes their research a very important topic. The tutorial, intended for a broad audience, presents the state of the art in RBNs, spanning over several lines of research carried out by different groups. We focus on research done within artificial life, as we cannot exhaust the abundant research done over the decades related to RBNs.},
	url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin.AO/0408006},
	author = {Carlos Gershenson},
	editor = {M. Bedau and P. Husbands and T. Hutton and S. Kumar and H. Suzuki}
}
@conference {Gershenson2004b,
	title = {Updating Schemes in Random {Boolean} Networks: Do They Really Matter?},
	booktitle = {Artificial Life {IX} Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {238{\textendash}243},
	publisher = {MIT Press},
	organization = {MIT Press},
	abstract = {In this paper we try to end the debate concerning the suitability of different updating schemes in random Boolean networks (RBNs). We quantify for the first time loose attractors in asyncrhonous RBNs, which allows us to analyze the complexity reduction related to different updating schemes. We also report that all updating schemes yield very similar critical stability values, meaning that the "edge of chaos" does not depend much on the updating scheme. After discussion, we conclude that synchonous RBNs are justifiable theoretical models of biological networks.},
	url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin.AO/0402006},
	author = {Carlos Gershenson},
	editor = {J. Pollack and M. Bedau and P. Husbands and T. Ikegami and R. A. Watson}
}
@article {HeylighenGershenson2003,
	title = {The Meaning of Self-Organization in Computing},
	journal = {IEEE Intelligent Systems},
	year = {2003},
	month = {July/August},
	pages = {72{\textendash}75},
	url = {http://pcp.vub.ac.be/Papers/IEEE.Self-organization.pdf},
	author = {Francis Heylighen and Carlos Gershenson}
}
@conference {GershensonHeylighen2003a,
	title = {When Can We Call a System Self-Organizing?},
	booktitle = {Advances in Artificial Life, 7th European Conference, {ECAL} 2003 {LNAI} 2801},
	year = {2003},
	pages = {606{\textendash}614},
	publisher = {Springer},
	organization = {Springer},
	address = {Berlin},
	abstract = {We do not attempt to provide yet another definition of self-organizing systems, nor review previous definitions. We explore the conditions necessary to describe self-organizing systems, inspired on decades of their study, in order to understand them better. These involve the dynamics of the system, and the purpose, boundaries, and description level chosen by an observer. We show how, changing the level or {\textquoteleft}{\textquoteleft}graining{\textquoteright}{\textquoteright} of description, the same system can be self-organizing or not. We also discuss common problems we face when studying self-organizing systems. We analyse when building, designing, and controlling artificial self-organizing systems is useful. We state that self-organization is a way of observing systems, not a class of systems.},
	url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin.AO/0303020},
	author = {Carlos Gershenson and Francis Heylighen},
	editor = {Banzhaf, W and T. Christaller and P. Dittrich and J. T. Kim and J. Ziegler}
}
