Complexity Digest

Subscribe to Complexity Digest feed Complexity Digest
Networking the complexity community since 1999
Updated: 1 hour 34 min ago

Feedback: How to Destroy or Save the World — Péter Érdi

Fri, 06/28/2024 - 13:46

The book offers an exciting, non-technical intellectual journey around applying feedback control to emerging and managing local and global crises, thus keeping the world on a sustainable trajectory. There is a narrow border between destruction and prosperity: to ensure reasonable growth but avoid existential risk, we must find the fine-tuned balance between positive and negative feedback.  This book addresses readers belonging to various generations, such as: young people growing up in a world where everything seems to be falling apart; people in their 30s and 40s who are thinking about how to live a fulfilling life;  readers in their 50s and 60s thinking back on life; and Baby Boomers reflecting on their past successes and failures.

Read the full article at: link.springer.com

François Chollet on Deep Learning and the Meaning of Intelligence

Fri, 06/28/2024 - 12:54

Which is more intelligent, ChatGPT or a 3-year old? Of course this depends on what we mean by “intelligence.” A modern LLM is certainly able to answer all sorts of questions that require knowledge far past the capacity of a 3-year old, and even to perform synthetic tasks that seem remarkable to many human grown-ups. But is that really intelligence? François Chollet argues that it is not, and that LLMs are not ever going to be truly “intelligent” in the usual sense — although other approaches to AI might get there.

Listen at: www.preposterousuniverse.com

Heinz von Foerster’s operational epistemology: orientation for insight into complexity

Fri, 06/28/2024 - 12:21

Arantzazu Saratxaga Arregi
Kybernetes

Purpose

Based on the reception of the principle of self-organization, the core of Heinz von Foerster’s operational theories, I hypothesize how Heinz von Foerster’s theory can be an orientation model for the epistemological problem of complexity. I have chosen this study to demonstrate complexity as an epistemological problem. This is because the question of how order arises – the core problem of complexity – is an epistemological question for which Heinz von Foerster developed an epistemology of self-organization. I do not present new research because HvF already had the complex organization of systems in mind. Rather, I build a critical approach to complexity on the research and work on operational epistemology in HvF.

Design/methodology/approach

This article aims to provide an orientation for a philosophical and epistemological understanding of complexity through a reading of Heinz von Foerster’s operational theory. The article attempts to establish complexity as an epistemological phenomenon through the following method: (1) a conceptual description of the science of complexity based on the turn to thermodynamic time, (2) a genealogy of complexity going back to the systemic method, and (3) Heinz von Foerster’s cybernetic approach to self-organization.

Findings

Based on the reception of the principle of self-organization, the core of Heinz von Foerster’s operational theories, the conclusion is drawn that complexity as a description is based on language games.

Research limitations/implications

The results present complexity not as an object of science, but as a description that stands for the understanding of complex description.

Social implications

The hypothesis that complexity is a question of description or observation, i.e. of description for what language serves, has enormous social implications, in that the description of complexes and the recognition of their orders (patterns) cannot be left to algorithmic governmentality, but must be carried out by a social agency.

Originality/value

HvF’s operational epistemology can serve as an epistemological model for critical complexity theory.

Read the full article at: www.emerald.com

Unveiling the reproduction number scaling in characterizing social contagion coverage

Fri, 06/28/2024 - 11:09

Xiangrong Wang, Hongru Hou, Dan Lu, Zongze Wu, Yamir Moreno

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals

Volume 185, August 2024, 115119

The spreading of diseases depends critically on the reproduction number, which gives the expected number of new cases produced by infectious individuals during their lifetime. Here we reveal a widespread power-law scaling relationship between the variance and the mean of the reproduction number across simple and complex contagion mechanisms on various network structures. This scaling relation is verified on an empirical scientific collaboration network and analytically studied using generating functions. Specifically, we explore the impact of the scaling law of the reproduction number on the expected size of cascades of contagions. We find that the mean cascade size can be inferred from the mean reproduction number, albeit with limitations in capturing spreading variations. Nonetheless, insights derived from the tail of the distribution of the reproduction number contribute to explaining cascade size variation and allow the distinction between simple and complex contagion mechanisms. Our study sheds light on the intricate dynamics of spreading processes and cascade sizes in social networks, offering valuable insights for managing contagion outbreaks and optimizing responses to emerging threats.

Read the full article at: www.sciencedirect.com

2025 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (IEEE SSCI 2025) – Trondheim, Norway 17th – 20th March

Wed, 06/26/2024 - 05:56

IEEE SSCI is widely recognized for cultivating the interchange of state-of-the-art theories and sophisticated algorithms within the broad realm of Computational Intelligence Applications. The Symposia provide for cross-pollination of research concepts, fostering an environment that facilitates future inter and intra collaborations.

The 2025 event marks a significant milestone in the evolution of IEEE SSCI, launching the newly restructured biennial Symposia Series featuring ten dedicated Applied Computational Intelligence Symposia.

More at: ieee-ssci.org

Fundamental Constraints to the Logic of Living Systems

Sun, 06/16/2024 - 13:52

Solé, R.; Kempes, C. P.; Corominas-Murtra, B.; De Domenico, M.; Kolchinsky, A.; Lachmann, M.; Libby, E.; Saavedra, S.; Smith, E.; Wolpert, D.

Preprints 2024, 2024060891

It has been argued that the historical nature of evolution makes it a highly path-dependent process. Under this view, the outcome of evolutionary dynamics could have resulted in organisms with different forms and functions. At the same time, there is ample evidence that convergence and constraints strongly limit the domain of the potential design principles that evolution can achieve. Are these limitations relevant in shaping the fabric of the possible? Here, we argue that fundamental constraints are associated with the logic of living matter. We illustrate this idea by considering the thermodynamic properties of living systems, the linear nature of molecular information, the cellular nature of the building blocks of life, multicellularity and development, the threshold nature of computations in cognitive systems, and the discrete nature of the architecture of ecosystems. In all these examples, we present available evidence and suggest potential avenues towards a well-defined theoretical formulation.

Read the full article at: www.preprints.org

Experimental Measurement of Assembly Indices are Required to Determine The Threshold for Life

Sun, 06/16/2024 - 09:51

Sara I. Walker, Cole Mathis, Stuart Marshall, Leroy Cronin

Assembly Theory (AT) was developed to help distinguish living from non-living systems. The theory is simple as it posits that the amount of selection or Assembly is a function of the number of complex objects where their complexity can be objectively determined using assembly indices. The assembly index of a given object relates to the number of recursive joining operations required to build that object and can be not only rigorously defined mathematically but can be experimentally measured. In pervious work we outlined the theoretical basis, but also extensive experimental measurements that demonstrated the predictive power of AT. These measurements showed that is a threshold in assembly indices for organic molecules whereby abiotic chemical systems could not randomly produce molecules with an assembly index greater or equal than 15. In a recent paper by Hazen et al [1] the authors not only confused the concept of AT with the algorithms used to calculate assembly indices, but also attempted to falsify AT by calculating theoretical assembly indices for objects made from inorganic building blocks. A fundamental misunderstanding made by the authors is that the threshold is a requirement of the theory, rather than experimental observation. This means that exploration of inorganic assembly indices similarly requires an experimental observation, correlated with the theoretical calculations. Then and only then can the exploration of complex inorganic molecules be done using AT and the threshold for living systems, as expressed with such building blocks, be determined. Since Hazen et al.[1] present no experimental measurements of assembly theory, their analysis is not falsifiable.

Read the full article at: arxiv.org

Pages